I have heard some animal communicators claim that animals only receive information intuitively in pictures. They then instruct people to send information to animals only through visualization. I think it would be impossible to prove such an assertion. Further, I find that in the field of animal communication one has to guard very carefully against the possibilty of tautalgy – i.e., I think something is true, therefore it is true. Here is something true: if you can somehow verify information you’ve received using intuitive communication, like the location of a lost animal or the description of an animal’s house, then that is real, accurate, and proven. Otherwise, it is speculation. If you cant prove something and until you do prove it, it is speculation. I don’t see any way that one could actually prove how animals receive. If you see a way, please tell me.
However, I do have my own assumptions about the matter: Since animals are demonstrably so much better at subtle perception than we are, and since they didn’t get any of the cultural desensitizing and repression we got about using intuition, it seems logical that they would have a full range of heightened intuitive perception, i.e., that they would be quite proficient at being able to hear, see, smell, taste, and feel intuitively or extrasensorily. I feel that the proposal that animals have limitations in in these abilties when compared to humans, is just another manifestation of the bias against animals that pervades human culture. When I communicate with animals, I send in a variety of modes and I assume that the animals receive in a variety of modes. If in fact, however, I am deluding myself, the worst case scenario would be this: the universal translator that seems to operate seamlessly for the process of intuitive communication, takes what I send as words to an animal, turns it into pictures, and the animal then understands me perfectly, regardless of the mode I used for sending.
I base my assumption that either 1) animals can receive in all modes or 2) some universal translator is working well and it therefore doesn’t matter how you send or how they receive, on a wealth of empirical proof that our animals hear and completely understand our intuitive communication. To view this anecdotal evidence, see any of my books, past newsletters on my website, or read past blogs. When I teach people to communicate intuitively with animals and nature, I tell them that it really does not matter what mode of communication one uses in intuitive conversation. You can say your message, think it, feel it, or visualize it… it’s all the same and it will be received. Of course, that does not mean that the animal will always act according to your wishes!
ABOUT PEPITA
This is the final piece about Pepita from Australian animal communicator, Ann Walker. Ann recently did a new website for her animal related books. Check it out at http://www.annwalkerbooks.com/
When Pepita died she was buried in the paddock where many of her friends lived, pieces of carrot and apple were spread on her grave at her memorial service conducted by a licensed celebrant and the occupants of the paddock strolled up and nibbled them as they took part in the ceremony which was not a funeral service but a celebration and thanksgiving for her life and the years we shared. This poem is my tribute to her.
Â
![]()
MORE THAN A MULE
(For Pepita. 25/11/1970 – 05/10/2002)
Just a mule – my head tells me,
And your photo confirms
That you indeed had long ears,
A tail and four hooves.
But I remember your eyes
And the friendship we shared.
You were not ‘Just’ anything.
Your intelligence, humour, and
Big, loving heart
Added up to a special soul;
An eternal Spirit who, God willing,
Has found green pasture,
Shady trees and old friends.
Enjoy – till I come looking for you.
Â
 STUPID PET TRICKS
In the days when I watched TV, I only watched David Letterman because of the stupid pet tricks. Once he did away with those it got pretty boring. Here is one I didn’t see… priceless.
Did anyone ever see a David Letterman stupid pet trick with a Border collie named Belle. Her trick was to go get the gopher. When given the command she raced across the stage and started digging frantically as if after a gopher. I don’t think it got recorded or is up on youtube. Too bad… also a classic. Did anyone ever watch the show where David interviewed animal communicator, Lydia Hiby? It was right after OJ was arrested and I understand he asked her to talk to the dog to see what happened. I never saw it and I wonder how that show was and what she said about the dog. If you have any information on that please get back to me.
I did hear that Beatrice Lydecker, the grandmother of animal communication, went on Johnny Carson and freaked out Ed McMahon so badly he had to leave the set. She told him that his cat really liked to perch on top of the frig and play with his toupe! LOL
 Hey if you like this blog, pass it along. Thanks.
This Post Has One Comment
Comments are closed.
Dear Marta,
I so enjoyed your blog today, especially where you mention the bias against animals and their abilities. How unbelieveably egotistical we humans are! And how ashamed we should be, since it is usually an animal in our lives that “wakes” us to the possibility of communicating with other species. Animals are so generous, so giving to us, and we are still so arrogant and limited in our own views of them!